The Implications of Evolution

  I am writing to share some thoughts on the implications of Evolution. It is a theory which suggest the transmigration of the species from lower to more complex levels. This progress must be tied to the genetic code and the assumption that the information in it increases over time in complexity and design. By accepting an Evolution "model" to explain ANY aspect of human development is to accept any of the corollary implications, and there are many.

    Some of these are very distasteful and challenge even the most liberal minded. There has been a lot of talk of human behavior being genetic. Genetic propensity is offered as the root of things like over-eating, drug use, alcohol abuse, and even violence. The field of "Evolutionary Psychology" has recently raised many eyebrows by suggesting that men are genetically disposed to propagate the species, and thus, explains why some resort to rape (look for information on "evolutionary psychology").

    Evolution is just a theory, but it is a theory that is hostile to our faith. The marriage of Biblical faith and Evolution (Theistic evolution) has been attempted, but only at the expense of the two separate doctrines. They are opposed to one another. Evolution does not allow for a Creator who guides the biological processes and the Bible states that man was created in the beginning by special supernatural processes. I propose that any attempt to have both, is a desire to have your cake and eat it too. Jesus said you cannot serve two masters.

    Theistic Evolution is adopted by many people who may want to sound scientific or informed, but they also want to be in the grace of God. Their problem is that they must allegorize what is not allegory. God created in six days. The "day-age" theory – the idea that a "day" in Genesis 1 refers to a long geological period of time – is an attempt to be religious while accepting the evolution "model."

    Hitler's Aryanism – the development of a pure and superior race – drew from Darwinian theories. Darwin and his followers - including his cousin, Sir Francis Galton-used Evolution theory to form racist ideas on intelligence and fitness. Galton traveled throughout Africa and developed his ideas on intelligence. To him, the Aristocracy of Britain represented the pinnacle of this development while other less intelligent groups (mediocre) were, by implication, lower on the evolutionary scale.

    Christians must, without apology, reject the idea of evolution. We are challenged to do so in the face of so much genetic experimentation in our day. Scientist are joining the DNA of one species with that of another (e.g. the pig and human experiment), but we must not be fooled into thinking that chance and time could explain the complexity of the human species.

    The human DNA sequence is too complex, too sophisticated, too ordered to believe it evolved. The Creation bears the fingerprints of a wise and powerful Creator. It is contrary to Biblical thought to suggest that God started with a simple cell, from that he added a little, spiced it up a little, waited awhile, added a little more, waited a while, allowed some short-circuits or dead-end, waited a while, added more spice, and then -- billions of years later -- man was made in God's image. If people want to believe this, fine, but it demeans the meaning of being human and it requires negating the miracles of the Bible. -- Dan

©2001 Dan Mayfield. Permission granted to use this article in any manner, as long as:
1) the content is not changed and 2) the name of the author is left on the article.

More Articles By Dan Mayfield